13 Dec The personal Sort of the fresh Therapist Questionnaire (PST-Q) was created by Fernandez-Alvarez mais aussi al
(2003), and you will was designed to assess “new gang of characteristics that each and every specialist is applicable in almost any psychotherapeutic disease, thus shaping a portion of the features of the fresh healing act” (p. 117). This new questionnaire assesses four additional dimensions: flexibility-rigidity (Educational subscale), distance-closeness (Expressive subscale), lesser involvement-greater involvement (Involvement subscale), wider centered-slim focused (Attentional subscale) and you may impulsive-organized (Medical subscale). This is exactly good thirty-six-items thinking-declaration size filled out because of the practitioners having solutions rated to your a beneficial size ranging from step one (total argument)so you’re able to eight (total arrangement). The measure has revealed an examination-retest accuracy out of .79, having Chronbach’s precision coefficients for every subscale, below; academic, .69; expressive, .75; wedding, .78; attentional, .80; surgical, .78. Foundation Investigation found a KMO = .756 (See Dining table step one to possess alphas in the present research).
Doing work Alliance Collection-Short Function (WAI-S)
The working Alliance Collection (WAI), developed by Horvath Greenberg (1986), is a beneficial thirty-six items survey which are often given so you’re able to each other members and you can therapists that’s ranked with the a beneficial 7-area Likert type scale from1 (never)so you can 7 (always). Tracey and Kokotovic (1989) advised a customer and you will specialist Functioning Alliance List-Short Form (WAI-S), which contains four affairs per subscale (Task, Objective, and you will Thread) and you can overall WAI-S ratings, showing large precision that have leader profile exactly like, and also much better than the WAI toward specialist subscales and you will full average results (Task, leader = .83; Bond, leader = .91; Goal, leader = .88; and you will General Alliance, alpha = .95). Look for Table 1 to own alphas in today’s research.
Process Checklist (TL)
The techniques List measure is adjusted away from Hollis (1995), exactly who catalogued an extensive range of guidance and psychotherapy techniques representing a standard spectral range of philosophical angles. To improve which detailed list considering process used especially by the cognitive behavioural and you can constructivist medication orientations, we hired guidance therapy scholar people to read through the full set of 108 procedures processes and rates the latest the quantity that for each and every method is employed by for each therapeutic method (cognitive behavioral and you will constructivist), having fun with an excellent 5-section Likert method of measure from (Never otherwise Almost never) to 5 (Usually otherwise Always).
Sixteen counseling psychology graduate students participated in these ratings (six men, 10 women), with the Mage = (SD = 2.67). Results of a paired differences analysis for all 108 items indicated that there were 77 techniques rated as being used with significantly differential frequency by cognitive behavioral and constructivist therapies. We then divided this distribution of 77 techniques into quartiles and retained the top and bottom quartiles. This resulted in 20 cognitive behavioral techniques (e.g.advice giving, rational restructuring) and 20 constructivist techniques (e.g. emotional processing, reflection) that were rated most significantly different (cognitive behavioral vs. constructivist). This final list of 40 items of therapy techniques (20 cognitive behavioral techniques; 20 constructivist techniques) was used in the current study.
Such forty points was noted alphabetically and you will professionals were requested in order to rate this new the quantity that they normally use for every single method inside their habit of medication together a great 5-part scale from 1 (Never otherwise Almost never)so you can 5 (Always otherwise More often than not). The new feedback of your own 20 rationalist factors have been summed and you can a indicate is actually calculated in order to reflect an average regularity of employing rationalist interventions (you can easily variety = 1-5), together with same techniques was applied with regards to brand new 20 constructivist interventions.
The brand new raw analysis was utilized so you can conduct an excellent confirmatory factor study with the Techniques Listing size. The modern investigation was checked for multi-variate normalcy therefore the assumptions was fulfilled. The kurtosis prices into the variables fell ranging from 1 and you can –step one details except constructivist points twelve, thirteen, 16, and you can 20 and you can cognitive behavioral item 3, which had https://datingranking.net/es/citas-internacionales a beneficial kurtosis beliefs anywhere between 2 and you can –dos. Thus, these types of five products was in fact removed from the brand new size just before powering the new confirmatory basis study.